You work for the local office of the public defender. You have a client, Ima Pot

You work for the local office of the public defender. You have a client, Ima Pothead, who has been charged with possession of illegal drugs. The police discovered the drugs in his home during the execution of a search warrant. The warrant was later invalidated by the presiding judge. The judge also held that the drugs should be excluded from the trial. Your charges against Ima Pothead will likely be dismissed if the seized drugs are excluded. You have been asked to prepare a memorandum on the issue. You will need to consider your state’s approach to dual constitutionalism.
1. Quote and cite the primary source of the constitutional right against unreasonable searches and seizures.
2. Does your state constitution specifically address the issue? If so, how? If not, how has your state judiciary approached to search and seizure questions?
3. Does your state interpret its constitution identically to how the U.S. Constitution has been interpreted or independently? If independent, cite an example of a differing interpretation and an example where your state courts have interpreted the state constitution identically, even though not required to do so.

Published
Categorized as Law

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *